Assertion (A): The advertising industry in India has of late acquired international character.
Reason (R): The collaborative arrangements with big multinational advertising agencies have brought them a global competitive edge.
Codes:
(A) Both (A) and (R) are true.
(B) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
(C) (A) is true, but (R) is false.
(D) (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct Ans: (B)
The assertion (A) says that the advertising industry in India has acquired an international character in recent times. This is true. In fact, Indian advertising agencies now handle global brands, use international strategies, and follow global creative standards. Many Indian ad campaigns also win international awards. This clearly shows that the industry is no longer limited to local markets.
Now, the reason (R) claims that collaborations with multinational advertising agencies have given Indian agencies a global edge. This is also true. Many Indian firms have tied up with or been acquired by global giants like Ogilvy, McCann, and JWT. These partnerships brought in international practices, new technologies, and global clients. As a result, Indian agencies learned to work in a highly competitive global environment.
However, even though both statements are true, the reason doesn’t fully explain the assertion. The international character of Indian advertising is not only due to multinational collaborations. Several other factors also play a major role. For example, the rise of global brands in India, increased digital presence, outsourcing of creative services, and growth of Indian talent abroad have all contributed to this shift. Therefore, the explanation is only partly correct.
In conclusion, both the assertion and the reason are true. But the reason is not the complete explanation for the assertion. Hence, the correct answer is (B) — Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).