Hypothesis cannot be in
(A) the nullified form
(B) the declarative form
(C) the directional form
(D) the general form
Correct Ans: (D)
Explanation:
In research, a hypothesis represents a specific, testable statement that predicts an outcome or explains a phenomenon. Researchers formulate it to guide the direction of their study. However, a hypothesis cannot be in the general form, as this lacks clarity, focus, and precision. Let us understand why.
To begin with, researchers use declarative, null, and directional forms to frame hypotheses. A declarative hypothesis clearly states the expected relationship between variables. Meanwhile, a null hypothesis proposes that there is no relationship or effect, which helps researchers attempt to disprove it. A directional hypothesis predicts the specific direction of the relationship—for example, “an increase in X leads to a decrease in Y.”
On the other hand, a general form lacks specificity. It offers vague statements that cannot be tested or measured effectively. For instance, saying “media affects people” is too broad. It does not identify which type of media, what kind of effect, or which group of people. Therefore, researchers must avoid general forms to ensure the hypothesis remains testable and researchable.
Furthermore, hypotheses serve as the backbone of scientific inquiry. Hence, researchers must design them carefully using specific variables, measurable outcomes, and clear predictions. This approach allows researchers to gather meaningful data and draw valid conclusions.
In conclusion, a hypothesis cannot exist in a general form because it fails to meet the essential requirement of testability. Only structured forms like null, directional, and declarative support rigorous and focused research in communication studies and beyond.
