The second press commission of India suggested the removal of ________ from the official secrets Act of India, 1923.
(A) Section 5
(B) Section 8
(C) Section 11
(D) Section 14
Correct Ans: (A)
Explanation:
The Second Press Commission of India recommended removing Section 5 from the Official Secrets Act, 1923. This recommendation aimed to promote transparency and strengthen press freedom. Since authorities misused Section 5 to suppress journalists, the commission suggested its removal to protect investigative reporting and free speech.
Section 5 criminalized unauthorized sharing of official information. Government officials often used this provision to prevent journalists from accessing crucial details. Because this law restricted press freedom, the commission argued that its removal would ensure accountability and limit excessive secrecy.
Now, let’s analyze the incorrect options. Sections 8, 11, and 14 exist in the Official Secrets Act, but they do not directly affect press freedom. Since only Section 5 posed a direct threat to journalism, the commission focused on eliminating it.
In conclusion, the Second Press Commission urged lawmakers to remove Section 5 to protect journalistic rights and ensure transparency. Since this step aimed to prevent government overreach, it reinforced the importance of an independent and free press.
