Assertion (A): The invention of Telephone changed the world of communication and its influence could be studied as a part of media education.
Reason (R): Telephone is a technical invention associated with communication and communication education has less research on the subject, yet communication scholars do not show interest to take it as a research topic
- Both (A) and (R) are true.
- Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not correct explanation of (A).
- (A) is true, but (R) is false.
- (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct Ans: (C)
Explanation:
The invention of the telephone truly changed the world of communication. It made voice interaction possible across long distances. This breakthrough reshaped how humans connect. Naturally, it should hold a significant place in media education.
Indeed, the assertion is true. The telephone marked a major leap in the evolution of media. Before it, people relied on letters or telegraphs. With the telephone, communication became instant and personal. This new mode influenced journalism, politics, and even personal relationships. So, it deserves attention in communication studies.
However, the reason provided is false. While the telephone is a technical invention, communication education does not ignore it entirely. Scholars have studied its historical impact, adoption, and social influence. Although modern research may now focus more on digital tools, the telephone still gets its share of academic interest.
Moreover, it’s wrong to say scholars lack interest. In fact, researchers have explored how telephones altered media structures and audience behaviors. They have also studied its role in emergencies, businesses, and interpersonal communication.
Therefore, we can say that the assertion is correct, but the reason is not. The telephone deserves a place in media education due to its deep and lasting impact. Still, it is incorrect to assume that communication scholars do not study it.
