Assertion (A): There is an urgent need for a law of privacy in
Reason (R): As most media outlets, especially electronic, have opted for blatant sensationalism, the proposition needs a global consideration.
(A) Both (A) and (R) are true
(B) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(C) (A) is true, but (R) is false
(D) (A) is false, but (R) is true
Correct Ans: (C)
Explanation:
Let’s first examine the Assertion (A): There is an urgent need for a law of privacy in India. This is true. With the rise of digital platforms, intrusive media practices, and growing threats to personal data, India lacks a comprehensive legal framework that protects citizens’ privacy. The Supreme Court of India even recognized the Right to Privacy as a fundamental right in 2017, further amplifying the demand for clear, enforceable legislation.
Now, consider the Reason (R): As most media outlets, especially electronic, have opted for blatant sensationalism, the proposition needs a global consideration. This is false. While sensationalism in media is undoubtedly a concern, it is not the primary reason India needs a privacy law. Privacy laws are essential for protecting personal data, preventing surveillance abuse, and upholding democratic rights in the digital age. Sensationalism may highlight the issue but doesn’t justify a global legal response—the law needs to be local, specific, and enforceable within national borders.
Furthermore, privacy issues extend far beyond the media—into areas like data collection by tech companies, state surveillance, and cybersecurity breaches. These challenges demand a structured legal response that media sensationalism alone cannot address.
Therefore, while both privacy concerns and media sensationalism are real, the Reason does not directly or correctly explain the Assertion. As a result, Option (C) stands as the most accurate answer.
In conclusion, India urgently needs a privacy law—but not solely because of sensational media. The need arises from broader systemic gaps in protecting individual autonomy and digital rights.
