Assertion (A): The tribe of eminent newspaper editors has vanished from 

Reason (R): The corporatisation of Indian press and the focus on profits have made it difficult for conscientious people to enter the profession.

(A) Both (A) and (R) are true.

(B) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).

(C) (A) is true, but (R) is false.

(D) (A) is false, but (R) is true.

Correct Ans: (B)

Explanation:

The number of eminent newspaper editors in India has declined over the years. However, this does not mean they have completely vanished. Many experienced editors still uphold journalistic ethics, but their influence has weakened due to changing media dynamics.

Moreover, the corporatization of the Indian press has shifted priorities. Profit-driven models dominate media houses, making revenue generation more important than editorial integrity. As a result, many newspapers focus on advertiser-friendly content rather than hard-hitting journalism. This shift limits the space for independent, fearless editors.

Additionally, the media landscape has evolved. Digital news, social media, and 24-hour television channels have changed how news is consumed. The traditional editor’s role has diminished as audience engagement now depends on speed, sensationalism, and click-driven content. This transformation forces many editors to prioritize business interests over journalistic principles.

Furthermore, while corporate influence affects editorial decisions, it is not the sole reason for the decline of eminent editors. Political pressures, changing reader preferences, and the rise of digital platforms also contribute. Many media organizations prioritize quick news production, reducing the need for in-depth editorial leadership.

Overall, both statements are true, but the corporatization of media is not the only reason for the decline of influential newspaper editors. The evolving nature of journalism, along with technological and political factors, has contributed to this shift.