Skip to content
First 20 students get 50% discount.
Login/Register
Call: +918298628674
Email: support@jmcstudyhub.com
JMC Study Hub
  • Category
    • UGC-NET Exam
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • UGC NET Paper-I
    • UGC NET Paper-II
    • CUET Mass Communication (UG)
    • Computer & AI Classes
    • Mock Tests
  • Study Resources
    • Quicky
    • Library
    • Previous Year Papers
    • JMC Sahitya
    • JMC Interviews
    • Mass Communication Personalities
    • Major Landmarks
0

Currently Empty: ₹0.00

Continue shopping

Try for free
JMC Study Hub
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • UGC NET Paper-I
    • UGC NET Paper-II
    • CUET Mass Communication (UG)
    • Computer & AI Classes
    • Mock Tests
  • Study Resources
    • Quicky
    • Library
    • Previous Year Papers
    • JMC Sahitya
    • JMC Interviews
    • Mass Communication Personalities
    • Major Landmarks

Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Vs. Cricket Association of Bengal

Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
June 2015 (III)

Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Vs. Cricket Association of Bengal

  • April 10, 2025
  • Com 0

In the case of Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Vs. Cricket Association of Bengal, the Supreme Court judgement led to: 

(A) censorship of foreign journals

(B) freeing electronic media from government monopoly

(C) imposition of surcharge on media advertisements

(D) restriction of media coverage of cricket matches

Correct Ans: (B)

Explanation:
The Supreme Court’s decision in the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting vs. Cricket Association of Bengal transformed the Indian media landscape. Before this verdict, the government tightly controlled all electronic media. Doordarshan held a monopoly over television broadcasting, limiting diversity and competition.

However, the Court recognized that broadcasting is an essential part of the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. Therefore, the state could not monopolize this medium indefinitely. This judgment emphasized that airwaves belong to the public. Consequently, the government must act as a trustee, not an owner.

The case began when the Cricket Association of Bengal wanted to telecast a tournament through a foreign broadcaster. Doordarshan denied permission. The association challenged this restriction, arguing it violated their right to communicate and share content.

In response, the Supreme Court ruled that the freedom of speech includes the right to communicate using electronic media. It held that citizens, not just the state, have the right to use broadcasting platforms. As a result, this judgment laid the foundation for private participation in electronic media.

Moreover, it opened the door to independent news channels and entertainment broadcasters. The ruling encouraged diversity in content and created a more competitive, transparent media ecosystem.

Thus, this landmark case dismantled the government’s exclusive control over broadcasting. It promoted media plurality and upheld constitutional freedoms. In today’s vibrant media environment, this verdict remains a cornerstone of media liberalization in India.

Assistant Professor
Dr. Ranjan Kumar

Founder & Educator

Tags:
broadcast rightselectronic media freedomIndian media regulationmedia lawMinistry of Information and BroadcastingSupreme Court judgment
Share on:
Dr. Ranjan Kumar

Founder & Educator

Who described media contents as cultural products?
The Press Council of India is a: 

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 - EduBlink. All Rights Reserved. Proudly powered by DevsBlink
JMC Study Hub
Sign inSign up

Sign in

Don’t have an account? Sign up
Lost your password?

Sign up

Already have an account? Sign in
Need help ?
WhatsApp
Hello, welcome to “JMC Study Hub”. How can we assist you?
Open chat