Match List – I with List – II:
| List – I (Theorist) | List – II (Theory) |
| (a) Daniel Lerner | 1. Primary vs. Secondary social attachment |
| (b) Ferdinand Toennies | 2. Urban vs. Rural society |
| (c) Mahatma Gandhi | 3. Gemeinschaft vs. Geselschaft |
| (d) C. H. Cooley | 4. Traditional vs. Modern society |
| Codes: | (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) |
| (A) | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| (B) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| (C) | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| (D) | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Correct Ans: (D)
Explanation
Understanding the impact of key theorists in communication and social sciences is essential. Their ideas help explain how societies function and evolve over time. The correct match is as follows:
- Daniel Lerner – Traditional vs. Modern Society
- Ferdinand Toennies – Gemeinschaft vs. Gesellschaft
- Mahatma Gandhi – Urban vs. Rural Society
- C.H. Cooley – Primary vs. Secondary Social Attachment
First and foremost, Daniel Lerner’s theory highlights the transition from traditional to modern societies. He argued that as literacy, urbanization, and media exposure increase, societies experience rapid progress. Consequently, modernization leads to greater economic and political development.
Similarly, Ferdinand Toennies introduced the concept of Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft to differentiate between two types of social structures. Gemeinschaft refers to close, community-based relationships, whereas Gesellschaft describes impersonal, large-scale urban interactions. As a result, this distinction helps in analyzing societal transformations.
At the same time, Mahatma Gandhi emphasized the contrast between rural and urban societies. He believed that self-sufficient villages form the backbone of a strong nation. Therefore, he advocated for decentralized governance and sustainable rural development.
Moreover, C.H. Cooley’s theory of primary vs. secondary social attachment explains human relationships in depth. Primary groups, such as family and close friends, involve deep emotional connections. In contrast, secondary groups, such as workplaces or institutions, function in a more formal and impersonal manner.
In conclusion, these theorists have played a significant role in shaping our understanding of social structures and communication patterns. Their ideas continue to influence research in media studies, sociology, and development communication.
