The widely used writing technique for an interview copy is
(A) descriptive
(B) anecdotal
(C) interrogative
(D) metaphorical
Correct Ans: (A)
Explanation:
In journalism, especially when crafting interview copy, descriptive writing stands out as the most widely used and effective technique. This style allows reporters to paint a clear and vivid picture of the setting, the subject’s expressions, and the emotions conveyed during the interaction. As a result, readers don’t just read the words—they feel the atmosphere of the interview.
Descriptive writing goes beyond simply quoting responses. Instead, it integrates small details, such as the tone of voice, pauses in speech, or even physical gestures. This approach enhances reader engagement and helps the audience connect emotionally with the subject. Consequently, it transforms interviews into more than just Q&A sessions—it turns them into powerful stories.
Now, let’s look at why the other options do not fit as well:
- (B) Anecdotal writing does appear in some interviews, but it usually plays a supporting role. It cannot drive the full copy.
- (C) Interrogative writing focuses on questions. However, interview stories require narrative flow, not just a list of queries.
- (D) Metaphorical writing can add flair, but overusing it in news pieces may confuse readers. Therefore, journalists use it sparingly.
Moreover, journalists favor descriptive writing because it adapts easily to both print and digital formats. Whether in newspapers, magazines, or online features, this style captures the essence of the subject and delivers a well-rounded portrayal. It also aligns perfectly with the expectations of modern audiences who seek authentic, detailed storytelling.
So, in conclusion, since descriptive writing brings clarity, color, and life to interview reports, option (A) is absolutely correct. It remains the journalist’s top choice when writing compelling and relatable interview copy.
