Assertion (A): Critical research guides a communication scholar to question the system and take steps to change the system.
Reason (R): Critical school was born to find out the shortcomings of positivism.
- Both (A) and (R) are true.
- Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not correct explanation of (A).
- (A) is true, but (R) is false.
- (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct Ans: (B)
Explanation:
Critical research is vital in the field of communication studies. It pushes scholars to question existing systems, structures, and ideologies. It encourages them to examine power dynamics and explore ways to challenge and change the system. This research often aims to uncover social inequalities, biases, and hidden agendas in media and communication.
The assertion is true. Critical research does not simply observe; it seeks to transform. It motivates scholars to ask tough questions and pursue social change through their findings. Scholars involved in critical research aim for more than understanding—they aim for action.
The reason is also true, but it does not directly explain the assertion. Critical theory emerged as a response to positivism, which focuses on observable facts and scientific methods. While positivism emphasizes objectivity and neutrality, critical research challenges these ideas. It argues that knowledge is influenced by power and social context. The critical school arose to question the limitations of positivism, especially its lack of attention to social change.
However, the reason does not fully explain why critical research encourages scholars to question the system. The emergence of critical theory is a part of the broader shift in thinking, but it does not directly explain the active role of critical research in driving change.
In summary, both the assertion and the reason are true, but the reason doesn’t fully clarify the assertion. Critical research not only questions systems but actively pushes for transformation.
