The Right to Know in India is
(A) Unlimited
(B) Unparalleled
(C) absolute
(D) Limited
Correct Ans: (D)
Explanation:
The Right to Know is a fundamental part of democracy. However, in India, this right is limited rather than absolute. While citizens have the right to access information, certain restrictions exist to protect national security, public order, and privacy.
This right is closely linked to Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and expression. The Supreme Court has ruled that the Right to Know is essential for an informed citizenry. However, the government can impose reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2). These restrictions help maintain security, sovereignty, and friendly relations with foreign states.
Additionally, the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, empowers citizens to access government records. Yet, Section 8 of the RTI Act places limits on disclosure. Information related to national security, foreign affairs, and personal privacy remains restricted. Similarly, courts can withhold information if it affects an ongoing case.
Moreover, journalists and media houses often use the Right to Know to demand transparency. However, sensitive matters like defense strategies or intelligence reports remain classified. In such cases, public interest and security must be balanced.
In conclusion, while the Right to Know is crucial for democracy, it is not unlimited. Laws like the RTI Act help ensure transparency, but national security and privacy concerns require careful restrictions.
