Assertion (A): Many of our social researchers are dubbed as data exporters. Reason (R): We lay too much emphasis on quantitative aspect and neglect the qualitative aspect of research. (A) It is difficult to agree with both (A) and (R). (B) Both (A) and (R) are correct. (C) (A) is incorrect, (R) is correct. (D) (A) is correct, (R) is incorrect. Correct Ans: (A) Explanation: The assertion (A) claims that many social researchers in India are labeled as "data exporters." This implies that researchers often collect large datasets without leveraging them for meaningful, in-depth analysis or social transformation. However, it is challenging to fully agree with this assertion. While some researchers may rely heavily on data collection, many also engage in valuable analytical work that benefits the academic and policymaking spheres. Therefore, this statement is subjective and lacks universal validity. The reason (R) states that this issue arises because researchers emphasize quantitative methods while neglecting qualitative aspects. Quantitative research does indeed focus on numerical data, trends, and statistical analysis, which are often critical for large-scale studies. However, qualitative research, which prioritizes in-depth understanding of human behavior and context, is equally vital. Although some researchers may overlook qualitative approaches, this cannot be generalized across the entire social research community. Thus, both (A) and (R) present partial truths but fail to fully capture the broader reality. Not all researchers prioritize quantitative data at the expense of qualitative depth. Many adopt mixed-methods approaches, combining both quantitative and qualitative methods to achieve balanced insights. Hence, the correct answer is (A): It is difficult to agree with both (A) and (R). This explanation underlines the need for a holistic approach in social research that values both numerical data and contextual understanding.