Assertion (A): The concept of community Journalism has made a definite exit from the Indian journalistic world. Reason (R): Modern technology has made the reach of TV and radio possible in every nook and corner of the country and supply the community related news effectively. (A) Both (A) and (R) are true. (B) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A). (C) (A) is true, but (R) is false. (D) (A) is false, but (R) is true. Correct Ans: (B) Explanation: Community journalism focuses on hyper-local news, addressing issues that directly impact small communities. While modern technology has expanded the reach of TV and radio, it has not completely replaced community journalism in India. The assertion that community journalism has made a definite exit is not entirely accurate. Many regional newspapers, local news portals, and community radio stations continue to serve specific populations. These platforms provide news on local governance, civic issues, and cultural affairs that national media may overlook. However, the reason given—modern technology enabling TV and radio to deliver news nationwide—is true but not the correct explanation for the decline of community journalism. Factors such as corporate media dominance, digital news consumption, and funding challenges have contributed more significantly to the struggle of community journalism. Moreover, community journalism has adapted to new platforms. Local news now thrives on social media, hyper-local news websites, and WhatsApp groups, ensuring that community-focused reporting remains relevant. In conclusion, while TV and radio have expanded news access, they do not fully replace the role of community journalism. It continues to exist in various forms, evolving alongside technological advancements.