The second press commission of India did not favour a code of ethics that was
(A) Informal
(B) Formal
(C) personal
(D) substantial
Correct Ans: (B)
Explanation:
The Second Press Commission of India did not support a formal code of ethics for journalists. Instead, it emphasized self-regulation over strict legal enforcement. The commission believed that a rigid, legally binding ethical code could restrict journalistic freedom and hinder independent reporting.
A formal code would have meant government-imposed rules, which could lead to censorship and limit press autonomy. The commission argued that journalism thrives in a free and responsible environment, where ethical practices evolve based on industry standards and public trust.
Instead, the commission recommended an informal and flexible approach to ethics. It encouraged media organizations to develop self-imposed guidelines through press councils, professional bodies, and editorial policies. This approach allowed journalists to adapt ethical standards to changing circumstances while maintaining press freedom.
For example, the Press Council of India (PCI) issues ethical guidelines but does not enforce them as strict laws. It plays an advisory role, ensuring that media ethics remain a professional responsibility rather than a legal obligation. This reflects the commission’s vision of ethical self-regulation.
In conclusion, the Second Press Commission rejected a formal code of ethics, favoring an industry-led approach. This ensured that journalists maintained ethical standards without government interference, preserving the independence of the press.
