Assertion (A): In the field of development communication, administrators and experts have not changed their strategies for long.
Reason (R): Because the role of communication in the existing system is negligible.
Codes:
(A) Both (A) and (R) are true.
(B) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
(C) (A) is true, but (R) is false.
(D) (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct Ans: (A)
Explanation:
The Assertion (A) is true because, in development communication, administrators and experts have relied on outdated strategies for a long time. They have failed to adapt to new communication technologies and participatory approaches, limiting the effectiveness of their initiatives. Traditional top-down models still dominate, even though modern communication tools and grassroots participation could improve results.
The Reason (R) is also true because communication has played a minimal role in the existing system. Many development programs prioritize bureaucratic procedures and economic planning over effective communication strategies. Due to this, the potential of media, ICT, and participatory dialogue remains underutilized in driving social change.
Moreover, Reason (R) correctly explains Assertion (A) because when communication is seen as negligible, administrators do not prioritize it. This lack of focus leads to outdated strategies, preventing innovation and more inclusive approaches in development projects.
Since both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and (R) correctly explains (A), the correct answer is (A): Both (A) and (R) are true.
In conclusion, development communication needs urgent reform. Administrators should recognize communication’s crucial role in creating awareness, mobilizing communities, and fostering participation. Without this shift, development efforts will continue using ineffective strategies.
