Assertion (A): The government cannot directly restrict one freedom by permitting another freedom.

Reason (R): Clause (1) of Article 19 of the Indian Constitution provides equal opportunity for every type of freedom.

(A) Both (A) and (R) are true.

(B) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).

(C) (A) is true, but (R) is false.

(D) (A) is false, but (R) is true.

Correct Ans: (D)

Explanation:

The government cannot selectively restrict one freedom while allowing another, as doing so would violate the principles of equality and justice. The Assertion (A) is false because reasonable restrictions on fundamental rights are allowed under the Indian Constitution. The state can impose limitations on freedom of speech, assembly, or movement in the interest of public order, security, and morality.

The Reason (R) is true, as Clause (1) of Article 19 guarantees six fundamental freedoms:

1. Freedom of speech and expression
2. Freedom to assemble peacefully
3. Freedom to form associations or unions
4. Freedom to move freely within India
5. Freedom to reside and settle in any part of India
6. Freedom to practice any profession or business

However, these rights are not absolute. The government can impose restrictions under Clause (2) to maintain public order, national security, and morality. This means that the state can regulate one freedom without necessarily affecting another.

Since (A) is false and (R) is true, the correct answer is (D). The government has the power to restrict freedoms under specific conditions, ensuring a balance between rights and responsibilities.