For U.S. Journalists, the ideal basis of news reliability is
(A) Triangulation
(B) Advocacy
(C) Saleability
(D) Authority
Correct Ans: (A)
U.S. journalists prioritize triangulation as the ideal basis for ensuring news reliability. This process involves cross-verifying information from multiple independent sources before presenting it to the public. As a result, triangulation helps maintain accuracy, objectivity, and credibility in journalistic practices.
To begin with, journalists understand that relying on a single source can lead to biased or incomplete stories. Therefore, they actively seek at least two or more supporting sources. This cross-checking process confirms whether the information is consistent across different perspectives. For example, if a reporter covers a political protest, they will not only speak to the protestors but also to officials and neutral observers.
Moreover, triangulation enhances public trust in media. In an era of misinformation and fake news, this method becomes even more important. It reassures readers that the journalist has taken steps to ensure factual reporting. Additionally, editors often require triangulated facts before approving sensitive or high-impact stories.
On the other hand, methods like advocacy or authority may introduce personal or institutional bias. While saleability focuses on what sells more rather than what is true, triangulation emphasizes truth and verification above all.
In conclusion, triangulation forms the foundation of responsible journalism in the U.S. It not only safeguards the truth but also strengthens journalistic integrity. Hence, to uphold reliability, U.S. journalists consistently adopt triangulation as a standard practice.
