Skip to content
First 20 students get 50% discount.
Login/Register
Call: +918298628674
Email: support@jmcstudyhub.com
JMC Study Hub
  • Category
    • UGC-NET Exam
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • UGC NET Paper-I
    • UGC NET Paper-II
    • CUET Mass Communication (UG)
    • Computer & AI Classes
    • Mock Tests
  • Study Resources
    • Quicky
    • Library
    • Previous Year Papers
    • JMC Sahitya
    • JMC Interviews
    • Mass Communication Personalities
    • Major Landmarks
0

Currently Empty: ₹0.00

Continue shopping

Try for free
JMC Study Hub
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • UGC NET Paper-I
    • UGC NET Paper-II
    • CUET Mass Communication (UG)
    • Computer & AI Classes
    • Mock Tests
  • Study Resources
    • Quicky
    • Library
    • Previous Year Papers
    • JMC Sahitya
    • JMC Interviews
    • Mass Communication Personalities
    • Major Landmarks

Analyzing the Validity of Doubt Management in Journalism

Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Dec 2011 (II)

Analyzing the Validity of Doubt Management in Journalism

  • February 20, 2025
  • Com 0

Assertion (A): When in doubt, leave it out.  

Reason (R): Time may run out while you try to clarify the doubt. 

(A) Both (A) and (R) are incorrect.  

(B) Both (A) and (R) are correct.  

(C) (A) is correct, (R) is incorrect.  

(D) (A) is incorrect, (R) is correct

Correct Ans: (D)

Explanation:

The assertion (A), “When in doubt, leave it out,” is incorrect. In journalism, accuracy and truth are essential. Journalists should aim to clarify doubts before reporting rather than omitting information altogether. Omitting important details could lead to incomplete or biased reporting, which impacts credibility and trustworthiness. Journalistic integrity demands thorough investigation and fact-checking to ensure the news represents reality.

The reason (R), “Time may run out while you try to clarify the doubt,” is correct. Journalism often operates under tight deadlines. Time constraints can make it challenging to verify every detail before publishing. However, this does not justify leaving out critical information entirely. Instead, journalists should strive to balance accuracy with timeliness. They could acknowledge uncertainties in their reporting while continuing to seek clarity later.

Thus, the correct answer is (D): (A) is incorrect, but (R) is correct.

In conclusion, while time constraints are a real challenge, responsible journalism requires verifying facts rather than omitting doubtful information. Reporting incomplete stories might save time, but it can damage a journalist’s credibility and lead to misinformation. Clear communication and transparency remain vital even under pressure.

Assistant Professor
Dr. Ranjan Kumar

Founder & Educator

Tags:
accuracyAssertioncredibilityjournalismJournalistsReasontrustworthinesstruth
Share on:
Dr. Ranjan Kumar

Founder & Educator

Understanding the Link Between Communication and Development
Distinguishing Majority Opinion from Public Opinion

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 - EduBlink. All Rights Reserved. Proudly powered by DevsBlink
JMC Study Hub
Sign inSign up

Sign in

Don’t have an account? Sign up
Lost your password?

Sign up

Already have an account? Sign in
Need help ?
WhatsApp
Hello, welcome to “JMC Study Hub”. How can we assist you?
Open chat