Assertion (A): There is a growing tendency among newspapers to editorialise in news reports, sensationalise news and not identify sources of the news reports.
Reason (R): The ubiquitous word ‘sources’ is used to cover speculation and biased writing.
(A) Both (A) and (R) are true.
(B) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
(C) (A) is true, but (R) is false.
(D) (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct Ans: (C)
Explanation:
Newspapers increasingly blend opinion with news reports, sensationalize events, and avoid disclosing sources. This practice blurs the line between objective reporting and subjective interpretation. When journalists mix opinions with facts, they risk misleading readers and shaping biased narratives. Additionally, sensationalizing news amplifies emotions rather than presenting balanced information. Failing to identify sources further weakens credibility, making it difficult for audiences to verify authenticity.
However, while many reports cite “sources” to justify speculation, this does not fully explain the trend of editorialization and sensationalism. Some newspapers prioritize engaging headlines and dramatic storytelling to attract readership, often at the expense of journalistic integrity. This shift results from commercial pressures, audience demand, and the influence of political or corporate interests.
Thus, the assertion remains true—modern journalism often favors editorialized, sensational content without clear sources. However, the reason does not fully explain this trend. While vague attributions like “sources” can contribute to biased writing, other factors also drive this shift in news reporting.
In conclusion, the decline of strict journalistic objectivity raises concerns about credibility and misinformation. Responsible journalism must prioritize factual accuracy, transparent sourcing, and balanced reporting to uphold public trust.
