Assertion (A): Corporate ownership of media is beneficial for audiences in the rural hinterland.
Reason (R): Market-driven media will not bother much about their social responsibility as they concentrate more on returns than anything else.
(A) Both (A) and (R) are true.
(B) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
(C) (A) is true, (R) is false.
(D) (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct Ans: (D)
Explanation:
Corporate ownership of media does not necessarily benefit rural audiences. Large media corporations operate with a profit-driven mindset, often prioritizing urban markets where advertising revenue is higher. As a result, rural areas receive limited coverage, with content catering primarily to urban consumers rather than addressing the unique concerns of rural populations. Media corporations focus on audience engagement that drives financial gain, leaving issues like agriculture, rural employment, and grassroots governance underrepresented.
The reason provided in the question is true. Market-driven media primarily aims at maximizing returns, often at the expense of social responsibility. They focus on entertainment, sensationalism, and high-profit news rather than educational or developmental content that rural audiences might need. Since advertisers prefer higher consumer spending demographics, corporate-owned media tends to overlook regions with low purchasing power, further marginalizing rural voices.
Since the assertion states that corporate media benefits rural audiences, which is incorrect, and the reason correctly explains why market-driven media prioritizes profit over responsibility, option (D) is the right answer. Corporate ownership may lead to concentrated media power, reducing diverse viewpoints and limiting coverage of rural issues.
A balanced media landscape that includes public service broadcasting and community media is essential to ensure that rural populations receive relevant and meaningful content rather than being neglected due to corporate profit motives.