Assertion (A): In India, the multimedia production is of bad quality.
Reason (R): Because, the technical personnel working for multimedia production are not professionally trained.
(A) Both (A) and (R) are wrong.
(B) Both (A) and (R) are right.
(C) (A) is true, but (R) is not the sufficient reason for it.
(D) (A) is not right, but (R) is partially true.
Correct Ans: (C)
Explanation:
In analyzing the assertion (A) and reason (R), it’s important to carefully evaluate their validity and connection.
First, the assertion states that multimedia production in India is of bad quality. While some may argue this based on specific instances, it is not universally true. India has delivered globally acclaimed multimedia content, particularly in movies, advertising, and animation. So, this claim is not entirely accurate.
Next, the reason suggests that the technical personnel working in multimedia production are not professionally trained. This is partially true in some cases, as a segment of multimedia production relies on self-taught or less formally trained individuals. However, there are many highly skilled and professionally trained personnel in India who contribute significantly to the industry. Thus, this reason does not fully explain the claim made in the assertion.
The key lies in the relationship between these two statements. While professional training does impact production quality, it is not the sole or sufficient reason for any perceived shortcomings in multimedia production. Other factors like budget constraints, lack of advanced technology, and limited resources could also contribute.
Therefore, the assertion (A) is correct in certain cases, but reason (R) does not provide a comprehensive explanation. Hence, the correct answer is (C): (A) is true, but (R) is not the sufficient reason for it.
