In Britain, the Press Council was replaced by (A) The Royal Press Commission (B) The Media Complaints Commission (C) The News Council (D) The Media Ombudsman Correct Ans: (B) Explanation: Britain replaced its Press Council with the Media Complaints Commission to improve media regulation. The Press Council, established in 1953, aimed to uphold ethical journalism but faced criticism for its inefficiency. Many believed it lacked authority to hold the press accountable. As media influence grew, so did concerns over journalistic ethics and accuracy. The government and media organizations felt the need for a stronger regulatory body. Consequently, they introduced the Media Complaints Commission, which had more power to address public grievances and ensure ethical reporting. Unlike its predecessor, the commission focused on handling complaints from individuals and organizations affected by media content. It worked to maintain a balance between press freedom and responsible journalism. By addressing public concerns more effectively, it aimed to rebuild trust in media institutions. Additionally, the commission played a key role in maintaining journalistic integrity. It ensured that newspapers and media houses followed ethical guidelines while reporting news. The press industry saw it as a step forward in self-regulation. Thus, the Media Complaints Commission replaced the Press Council to create a more accountable and transparent media environment. It reflected the evolving needs of media governance in Britain.