Tag: Indian media law

Assertion (A): The Indian law of copyright needs a thorough revamp. Reason (R): The digital technology has made the people adopt unfair means for privacy especially in the film industry. (A) Both (A) and (R) are true (B) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A). (C) (A) is true, but (R) is false (D) (A) is false, but (R) is true Correct Ans: (C) Explanation: The correct answer is (C) (A) is true, but (R) is false. To start with, the assertion states that Indian copyright law needs a thorough revamp. That’s absolutely true. The rise of digital media and online platforms has outpaced the current legal framework. These outdated laws struggle to handle issues like online content sharing, streaming, and digital downloads. So, a modernized version must address these complex digital realities. Now let’s consider the reason given: it claims that people use unfair means for privacy, especially in the film industry. But here’s the problem—this statement misrepresents the issue. First, it likely meant to refer to piracy, not privacy. That’s a key distinction. Piracy involves unauthorized copying and distribution of media content, which truly is a growing problem in the digital space. However, the reason as stated talks about privacy, which is unrelated to copyright law or the justification for reforming it. Secondly, even if we interpret it as piracy, the reason narrowly focuses on the film industry. But copyright issues affect many creative sectors—like publishing, music, software, and journalism. Thus, limiting the argument to just one industry fails to justify a complete overhaul of the law. Also, the logic doesn't align fully. Yes, piracy is one factor, but copyright reform must address a broader scope—fair use, licensing, user-generated content, and international compliance. So, while the assertion is valid, the reason doesn’t correctly support it. Therefore, the right answer is option (C).

Tag: Indian media law

Why Indian Copyright Law Needs an Urgent Overhaul

Bennet, Coleman & Co vs Union of India case in 1970s deals with